伦理知识抢答

伦理知识抢答 高清

评分：
9.0 推荐

分类： 记录片 2005

导演： Simon Ludgate

立即播放 报错
排序

播放地址

剧情介绍

　　This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
　　THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
　　Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
　　As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .

猜你喜欢

评论:

  • 理芳润 0小时前 :

    几段枪战有点谍影重重的意思了，但整体剧情冲突不够强烈，缺少情理之外的反差

  • 郎白亦 5小时前 :

    一星给男主演技，二星给枪战现场布置，三星给影射的现实

  • 采鸿 2小时前 :

    枪戏太离谱了！！！扣分！

  • 袭菀柳 7小时前 :

    No.2500 故事可以是个好故事，但这部电影讲得也太简单了。而且就凭一个农家院里的十几个人，就能干这么大一票了？

  • 经采莲 4小时前 :

    克里斯最近的电影不能说毫无特色，真的是毫无看点。

  • 雅婷 7小时前 :

    冲着舰长的颜值看的，我怎么觉得这部片的名字应该和同期上的另一部片《宝刀不老》换换？

  • 泉浓绮 5小时前 :

    ★★☆ 过于俗套的剧情，枪战戏也没觉得有多精彩

  • 越代玉 2小时前 :

    典型的模板化影片。这种感觉就有点像是。。夏天吃个西瓜，只管啃就是了

  • 漫漫 3小时前 :

    印度人开挂可以，是不是开挂靠点谱啊？反派看到投降不是第一时间就开枪打死？前半段还可以，后半段简直变成玄幻剧了。

  • 郜锐藻 8小时前 :

    额。非常英国 观影20分钟已经可以想像到后面会怎么演了 但很想看舞台剧

  • 薇俊 1小时前 :

    很压抑，中年退伍军人，想为了家庭拼一把，却在犄角旮旯，默默死去

  • 郗惜天 2小时前 :

    虎头蛇尾了，被强制退役之后演绎的很棒，自从任务开始整体剧情就乱飘，最后收尾也很潦草

  • 桓震 0小时前 :

    中规中矩的一片吧！

  • 琳柔 5小时前 :

    一部中规中矩（第一幕戏节奏也有些慢也显得长）的商业动作片，剧情想要借这几年的新冠话题吧，但缺乏惊喜，还有无论是曾经的鲍小强还是男主角都明显老了

  • 郦倩美 8小时前 :

    典型的想法大于能力，能感觉出来很努力的想拍一部好电影，但是，剧情硬伤太多，推情绪的节奏感又混乱，还是那句：烂编剧不分国界

  • 车孤松 5小时前 :

    这届恐怖分子不行，居然想等自己跑到安全地方再引爆炸弹。

  • 零炫明 2小时前 :

    当男主判断会议中心遭到袭击而跑过去时，我还以为他打算跑过去赤手空拳的干架呢？！

  • 雯格 9小时前 :

    并不是一部主题空洞的老套动作片，相反，跟《美国狙击手》《拆弹部队》等优秀作品一样，聚焦美国退伍军人的生存状态。

  • 锦花 0小时前 :

    老套的退役失落老兵复仇记，再配上本·福斯特一口“嘴里盘了核桃”的生硬口音，毫无观感

  • 梅寅骏 4小时前 :

    开头冗长絮叨，中段进入正题之后逐渐空言无物，然后草草收尾。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved