Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
崔志佳可以啊，笑点密集，结尾也没俗套的煽情，相当不错了。
流于表面的剧本情感，一惊一乍的表现形式，这浓浓的小品味竟然能撑起90分钟，也算是废话文学下的奇迹了
好片，值得五星
多加一颗星，感谢给当下焦躁的神经一点温暖和抚慰
21.11.11网络观看，佳佳确实不负我望，影片剧情节奏对于一部喜剧来说，诚意满满。就是腰子姐镜头删减的有点多。
“这不是你们炊事班的喳喳吗？”笑鼠。中规中矩的小品中规中矩的电影，崔志佳胖了好多。套路也挺俗的，大老板心疼操劳的父亲竟然选择派遣员工搞黄父亲的店，结果员工自己做大做强了。但是什么整挺好的呢，就是没有太苦情，还行。
emmmmmm，感谢你没进电影院骗钱，送你一颗星
刚看完告别天团，想起这个来来，竟然也是佳佳导演？没进步啊那也
老套的美式少年成长剧情，不过我真的好爱哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
挺逗的，没想到爱笑会议室出来这么多喜剧人才。好多年没有看大崔的作品了，人也确实发福了，啤酒肚也有了，但是幽默细胞还在。
还真不错，这要电影院上映还了得啊，腾讯就81分钟，估计剪了不少笑点。。
唯一笑了一声的地方是海边签约被垃圾袋糊脸。这大概是我看过的整容脸最多的电影之一，审美感人。烧烤看着还不错加一星。
看得真的很痛苦，看了五十分钟确实坚持不下去了
没错 我最近就是爱上大半夜饿着肚子看美食视频自虐 故事很可爱
看完之后，一是觉得他媳妇真贤惠啊，不嫌你没钱不骂你没本事，还支持你放弃体面的工作，追求自己内心的想法；二是，镜头怼着那些烤串拍，看着太有食欲了。
这两年真是网络大电影井喷的两年，有点人气和资源的都得掺和两下子
很轻松幽默的片子，题材选的很吸引人，节奏也挺紧凑，比很多强行欢笑的片好很多
有的时候只有努力go up 才能有勇气come out
这电影就是一个加长的小品，还没小品好玩。。。这再一次说明了一件事儿，那就是电影不是谁都能拍好的，好些演员都觉得自己观众缘好演技好然后自己导个电影应该也不错，但真不是这么回事儿！
题材新颖，故事也有趣，要是多些描写烧烤的情节就好了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
